Beneath the occasional headlines celebrating record salmon runs lies a troubling reality: our collective fixation on rare good years masks the long-term collapse of these vital salmon populations. See how this hidden mental trap threatens real progress.
Researchers have found that both decision-makers and communities demonstrate an "intermittent reinforcement bias" - where rare good outcomes leave a stronger impression than frequent bad ones. This makes occasional salmon booms disproportionately influential in shaping policy and public perception.
This cognitive distortion creates a dangerous form of collective denial, where societies continue high-risk practices despite mounting evidence that they're losing the conservation gamble.
However, what sets the current situation apart is the alarming long-term trajectory: the peaks are becoming increasingly fleeting and less frequent, while the periods of decline plunge to unprecedented lows with each passing decade.
This troubling trend is evident on B.C.’s central coast, where sockeye populations have suffered a devastating 90 per cent decline over the past 70 years.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) expressed “serious concerns” over Fraser River sockeye runs, which saw historically low returns of only 293,000 sockeye in 2019 and 2020, a stark contrast to the 20 to 40 million a century ago.
What's Causing Salmon Decline?
The diminishing numbers of wild salmon are not due to a single factor, but rather a complex interplay of environmental stressors and human impacts. Understanding these threats is crucial for effective conservation.
Mining Activities
Tsolum River: In the 1960s, the Mount Washington Copper Mining Co. operated in the Tsolum River watershed, extracting 940,000 tonnes of waste rock. This led to a dramatic decline in Coho salmon populations, from 15,000 in 1964 to just 14 by 1984.
Britannia Beach: Mining activities at Britannia Beach resulted in acid rock drainage, severely polluting Britannia Creek and Howe Sound. This contamination caused the death of approximately 4.5 million juvenile chum salmon from the Squamish Estuary.
Habitat Degradation
Urban development, agriculture, and industrialization have destroyed critical salmon habitats. Dams, pollution, and the loss of riparian vegetation affect vital spawning and rearing environments across BC and beyond.
Ecstall River:Industrial loggingin the Ecstall River watershed has degraded critical salmon habitat.
Fish Farming
Open-net pen fish farms pose a major threat, transmitting diseases like sea lice to wild salmon. Chemical and antibiotic use in these farms can also lead to widespread environmental contamination.
Clayoquot Sound: This UNESCO Biosphere Reserve hosts approximately 20 open-net pen salmon farms. These farms have been linked to disease outbreaks, including a significant die-off in 2019, and the spread of sea lice and pathogens to wild salmon populations .
Overfishing
Industrial trawling in British Columbia is responsible for catching and discarding tens of thousands of salmon each year, with almost all of these fish dying before they hit the ocean again. In the 2023/24 season alone, industrial groundfish trawl vessels caught an estimated 28,000 salmon.
This bycatch is not a rare event:
Over the last 15 years, more than 140,000 salmon have died as trawl bycatch, with Chinook consistently making up around 89–93% of that total.
The illusion of "peak fixation" is amplified by "shifting baseline syndrome." This cognitive bias means that each generation defines what's "normal" based on their own lived experience.
The term was coined by fisheries scientist Daniel Pauly in 1995. For salmon, the abundant runs of the past are gradually forgotten, and today's depleted populations become the new, accepted benchmark for a healthy ecosystem.
1
Generational Amnesia
Each new generation accepts a lower standard of natural abundance as the norm, losing awareness of previous ecological conditions.
2
Inflated "Peaks"
Against this lowered baseline, even minor increases in salmon returns are celebrated as significant recovery, despite remaining far below true historical levels.
Why does peak fixation matter? Because it breeds dangerous complacency among decision-makers, managers, and the public. Those unusual high years become justification for maintaining the status quo or delaying difficult conservation decisions.
Policy Paralysis
Regulators point to exceptional years as evidence that current management approaches are working, despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
Delayed Protection
Critical habitat designations and fishing restrictions get postponed after "good" years, even when long-term averages continue declining.
Lessons from the Collapse of the Atlantic Northwest Cod Fishery
The collapse of the Canadian cod fishery in 1992 is a cautionary tale that mirrors the risks facing wild salmon runs today. It shows how peak fixation can lead to irreversible loss.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, cod catches surged due to advanced trawlers and sonar. These peaks gave the illusion of abundance, masking long-term decline.
Policy Paralysis
Despite scientists warning of overfishing, Canadian regulators delayed quota cuts, influenced by recent high catches.
Delayed Protection
By the time a fishing moratorium was enacted in 1992, cod stocks had collapsed beyond recovery thresholds.
Resource Misallocation
During the cod boom, investments flowed into fleet expansion instead of stock rebuilding. When stocks collapsed, the infrastructure became obsolete.
Disaster in the Troughs
Successive poor years pushed cod below replacement levels; once spawning groups vanished, recovery became impossible.
How You Can Break Free from the Peak Fixation Trap
Focus on Long-Term Trends
When you see headlines about record salmon runs, don’t just focus on the one good year. Look at multi-year averages, historical data, and full stock reports to understand the bigger picture.
Urge local media and government to report salmon numbers with full context.
Insist they show data alongside long-term averages and historical baselines, not just short-term highs.
Without this, the public may become complacent and less supportive of needed conservation measures. For instance, write letters to editors or comment on press releases, requesting "multi-decade trend" graphs to accompany seasonal counts.
Support Independent Science
Support or volunteer with non-government research groups that study and publish independent analyses of fish populations.
These independent organizations are critical for counterbalancing overly optimistic official messaging and maintaining necessary pressure on management agencies to take action.
Share your concerns and ask officials how they are managing the risks of low fish years, not just the good ones. Informed and consistent public scrutiny makes decision-makers less likely to delay critical conservation actions.
Watch the Budget
Monitor how conservation money is spent each year. Advocate for steady funding for habitat restoration and monitoring, even after "good" salmon runs.
When funding jumps up after bad years but drops after good ones, it creates an unstable cycle - just like the problem in managing fisheries.
Request the public release of escapement targets and consistent reporting on whether these targets are met over multiple years.
Vote for candidates who demonstrate a commitment to science-based fisheries management. When officials know the public is paying attention to both the highs and lows, they’re less likely to ignore long-term problems.
The Path Forward: From Peaks to Sustainable Populations
Support organizations working on habitat restoration
Ask your representatives about long-term salmon recovery planning
When you see "record run" headlines, look for the context of multiple-year averages
Share this information with others interested in salmon conservation
Share This Resource
Help spread the word about salmon conservation and peak fixation. Your support is crucial in advocating for long-term solutions and ensuring a sustainable future for salmon.